Sartre's "The Humanism of Existentialism"

UC Davis Philosophy 1

G. J. Mattey


"The Humanism of Existentialism"
  • Philosophy 1
  • Spring, 2002
  • G. J. Mattey
Jean-Paul Sartre
  • Born 1905
  • From France
  • Worked with the French Resistance in World War II
  • Wrote novels, short stories, and plays
  • Became a Marxist
  • Turned down Nobel Prize (1964)
  • Died 1980
Sartre's Contributions
  • Popularized existentialism
  • Reformulated Descartes's dualism a contemporary framework
  • Argued for absolute freedom and responsibility for human beings
  • Author of many memorable quotations and examples
    • "Man is a useless passion"
    • "Hell is other people"
Existentialism
  • Existentialism is a philosophy of human existence
  • The existence of a human being is prior to that humans essence
  • What I am now is a matter of the free choices I have made
  • "Subjectivity must be the starting point"
Marxist Criticisms
  • Marxists emphasized human solidarity and materialist determinism
  • They accused existentialism of despairing of solutions to societal problems
    • This leads to contemplation, not action, so existentialism is a bourgeois philosophy
  • Since it begins with the subjectivity of the "I think," they accuse it of precluding solidarity with other people
Christian Criticisms
  • Existentialism neglects the gracious and beautiful in favor of the "sordid, shady, and slimy"
  • By denying that there are divine commands, it makes all human action arbitrary
  • It is impossible to criticize the actions of another, since it is due entirely to the others choice, which is not based on principle
Optimism and Pessimism
  • Those who criticize existentialism for being too gloomy are themselves very pessimistic
    • Bad actions are considered "human nature"
    • They encourage us to submit to authority
    • They tell us that rebellion is romantic fantasy
  • These people may be afraid of existentialism because of its optimism, since humans retain the possibility of choice
What Existentialism Is
  • The label "existentialist" is attached to all kinds of things, "even the work of a musician or painter"
  • But existentialism is a technical philosophical doctrine
  • The existentialist camp is split
    • Christians (Jaspers, Marcel)
    • Atheists (Heidegger, French existentialists, Sartre)
  • They agree on the doctrine that existence precedes essence
Essence As Preceding Existence
  • In the case of an artifact (e.g., a paper-cutter), production of an existing thing follows a prior concept
  • God's creation of the world would work in the same way: human beings would be made in accord with a concept of them
  • Enlightenment philosophers (e.g., Kant) made "human nature" the essence the precedes existence
  • Atheist Existentialism
    • A more coherent account of human beings denies the existence of God
    • If there is no God, there is at least one kind of creature, the human being, in whom existence precedes essence
    • Man turns up on the scene and then defines himself as man
    • So, he must have begun as nothing
    • There is no human nature, because there is no God to conceive of it: man is only what he wills himself to be
    Subjectivity
    • The starting point for humans is subjective because humans make themselves what they are
    • Subjectivity is a dignity, not a drawback
      • Only humans are possessed of subjectivity
    • Making ourselves what we are leaves us responsible for our own actions
    • Humans are responsible not only for themselves, but for all humanity, since "we create an image of man as we think he ought to be"
    • We always choose the good, which is good for all
    Anguish
    • Existentialists say that the human being is anguish
    • Someone who chooses for himself and for all of mankind realizes his deep responsibility
    • To deny this is an act of universal lying
    • Anguish is evident when we lack a proof that what we have chosen to do is right (what Kierkegaard called the anguish of Abraham")
    • It is the basis for action, because it acknowledges various open possibilities
    Forlornness
    • Heidegger described humans as forlorn because we must face the consequences of the non-existence of God
    • This is opposed to the view that nothing would change if God does not exist
    • It is distressing because there is no ultimate source of values if God does not exist
    • Dostoyevsky: If God does not exist, everything is permitted
    Freedom
    • The human being is freedom, with no justification or excuses
    • We are condemned to be free insofar as we find ourselves thrown into the world as free beings
    • We are even responsible for our own passions
    The Choice
    • A student has good reasons to remain with his mother or to leave her to try to fight the Nazis
    • It is a certainty that staying will help her, and an ethics of sympathy dictates it
    • It is not certain that he would help against the occupier, but a broader ethics dictate it
    • There is no means, Christian or Kantian, to force a choice in either direction
    • He remained with his mother, deciding in terms of feeling: the choice made the feeling right
    Despair
    • Despair means that we can only reckon from probabilities
    • The possibilities from which probabilities are drawn cannot be adapted to the will
    • We might count on people we know well, but this is just like counting on the trolley's not jumping the tracks
    • On the other hand, we can strive to make the future different from what it would be without our actions
    Reality Alone Counts
    • An person is of a certain kind (e.g., writer) only insofar as he engages in that activity
    • What a person hopes or wishes to be does not matter; only the produced realities do
    • In assessing a person, we must take all his activities into account
    • For man is the sum of his undertakings
    Optimistic Toughness
    • Existentialist write of people with character flaws
    • They do not attribute these to circumstances or heredity, but to free choices
    • There is no such thing, e.g., as a cowardly constitution, as there is a nervous one
    • But people would like these traits to be deterministic
    • The existentialist keeps open the possibility of change in anyone in any circumstance
    Subjectivity Again
    • The human starting-point must be subjective
    • The only firm beginning is "I think; therefore, I exist"
    • Everything else is mere probability
    • This prevents man from being reduced to an object
    • It also acknowledges that the other is indispensable to my own existence (e.g., as witty)
    Universality
    • There is a universal human condition: mortal being in the world
    • This is objective, and the situation of any human can be understood
    • But it is subjective, as the human condition is always being built through individual human choices
    The Consequences of Subjectivity
    • The subjectivity of existentialism is said to have bad consequences
      • No one must act on principle, leading to anarchy
      • No one may pass judgments on another
      • Choice is arbitrary
    • The first objection is not serious
      • One may not choose not to choose
    • The choices are made in a way that involves all of mankind
    Art and Ethics
    • We do not criticize painters for not having a pre-conceived notion from which they work
    • The values appear in the painting itself
    • Ethical decisions are like artistic creations
    • In choosing our ethics, we make ourselves
    • "It is therefore absurd to charge us with arbitrariness of choice"
    Relativity
    • In a sense we cannot pass judgment on others
    • People are what their choices, made in a situation, make them
    • There is no progress in the sense of betterment
    • One can still pass judgment, however
      • We can condemn those who take refuge in the excuse that the passions dictated his actions
      • Dishonesty is an error: choosing dishonesty is less coherent than choosing honesty
    Moral Judgment
    • Upon becoming forlorn, a person can only wish for freedom
    • When we are engaged in activity, our freedom depends on the freedom of others
      • Cowards hide freedom from themselves with deterministic excuses
      • Stinkers try to show that their existence is necessary
    Abstract Morality
    • Kantian morality correctly recognizes the central role of freedom
    • But it is too abstract to provide real moral guidance
    • The concrete case of the student cannot be decided on Kantian grounds: there is always invention
    Seriousness
    • Inventing values is a serious business
    • It would be nice if another being were a source of values, but there is none
    • When we come into the world, we have to provide values for ourselves
    • This provides the possibility for creating a human community
    Humanism
    • One meaning of "humanism" has been rejected in Sartre's Nausea
      • Taking individual credit as a human for the deeds of others
    • Another is implicit in existentialism
    • Man transcends his individuality
    • The only universe is a human one, and the only lawmakers individual human beings
    • It would not matter even if God did exist
    .

    [ Lecture Notes | Index of Slides | Philosophy 1 Home Page]